Legal Opinion

Palcsesz v. Midland Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 14, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-2944(DRD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge.

This diversity insurance action arises from the death of Imre Palcsesz. Mr. Palcsesz’s wife, plaintiff Dominique Palc-sesz, seeks to recover life insurance proceeds on a policy issued to her husband by defendant Midland Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Midland”). The manner of decedent’s death is the primary issue in the case, as it will determine Midland’s liability under the insurance policy. Defendant Midland moves for summary judgment on the grounds of judicial estoppel. For the reasons set forth herein, Midland’s motion will be granted and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claudio v. MGS MacHine Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Quilloin v. Tenet Healthsystem Philadelphia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. MARRONE v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. SULLIVAN v. BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. WOLF v. WOLFDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API