Legal Opinion

Claudio v. MGS MacHine Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2011No. Civil Action 09-4378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On February 14, 2008, Plaintiff Jorge Claudio (“Claudio” or “Plaintiff”) injured his hand while operating a cake-packaging machine manufactured by Defendant MGS Machine Corporation (“MGS” or “Defendant”) at a Tasty Baking Company (“TBC”) plant. See Compl. ¶¶ 8, 11, 17, ECF No. 1. Claudio has brought suit against MGS alleging negligence, strict liability in tort, and breach of warranty. MGS has filed a third-party complaint against TBC, claiming that TBC should answer for any and all liability that may be entered against MGS by way of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J.L. Nagle. v. TrueBlue, Inc., Labor Ready, Inc. and Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. and Rye Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. LATHAM v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Noble Bottling, LLC v. Hull & Chandler, P.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
  4. SOLOMON v. FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Trently v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API