Legal Opinion

Schlotfeldt v. Bull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1895No. 1448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.— Hon. Carroll B. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

After the commencement of this action in the lower court, counsel for the appellants (plaintiffs therein) filed the following paper, duly signed by them:

“ The defendants in the above entitled action and each of them are hereby given until Monday, the 15th day of January, 1894, inclusive, within which time to appear in the above entitled cause, and no default will be taken against them or either of them for their failure to appear before said date.”

It appears that on that day, viz., January 15th, the respondents, Walter A. and Bebecca N. Bull,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams ex rel. Tabert v. Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Crooks v. RustWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hayes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. City of Tacoma v. Nisqually Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Kahue v. PalaualeloHawaii Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API