Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Asch, J. (dissenting).
No member of this court feels more strongly than do I that employees should be protected in their job security. The interest of a worker in a job, especially in public employment, has increasingly been protected, either as a property right or simply as a matter of fairness (see Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564; see, also, Friedman, Law in a Changing Society, ch 10, Individual Freedom, Group Control and State Security, p 255).
Upon review of the cases, however, it is my considered judgment that we are bound under constraint of Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc. (57 NY2d 458),…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.