MacHado v. State Water Resources Control Board
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
In this appeal, plaintiffs Robert A. Machado, David A. Machado, Frank R. Machado, Mabel G. Machado, and Machado & Machado Dairy (collectively referred to as the Dairy) challenge the issuance of a cleanup and abatement order. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued this order because the Dairy was discharging manure and wastewater into a ditch that flowed into a drainage system and then into the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
The Dairy asserts (1) due process required a hearing before the cleanup and abatement order could be issued, (2) the order was vague and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mohilef v. JanoviciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- United States v. Virgilio Patricio FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- California Consumer Health Care Council, Inc. v. Department of Managed Health CareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Monterey Coastkeeper v. Monterey Cnty. Water Res. Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Regional Water Quality Control etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.