Legal Opinion
United Refining Co. v. Department of Energy
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 79-144 ERIEPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WEBER, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action which is now before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The plaintiff, United Refining Company, in its complaint and in its motion challenges the substantive and procedural validity of certain Department of Energy regulations, alternatively referred to as “banking regulations” or “fictitious recovery rules.” In its motion the plaintiff contends that these regulations were not promulgated in a manner which comports with the requirements of either the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Northern Pacific Railway Company and Continental Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Independent Bankers Association of America, a Corporation v. John G. Heimann, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
- Economou v. ButzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974