Crews v. Russell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
‘ Candler, Justice.
This is a statutory suit to recover six acres of land. The attorneys for the plaintiff in error insist that the description under which the plaintiffs sought to recover was too indefinite, and that under the principle announced in Huntress v. Portwood, 116 Ga. 351 (3) (42 S. E. 513), and Paulk v. Perry, 44 Ga. App. 131 (160 S. E. 681), a valid verdict and judgment could not be rendered thereon. Reference to the foregoing statement of facts will disclose that the petition, together with the abstract of. title which was duly made a part thereof, fully and completely describes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huntress v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Moss v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Watkins v. NugenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Terrell v. GouldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Buffington v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.