Legal Opinion

Buffington v. Carter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1945No. 15238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

In the brief filed by the plaintiff in error, the only reference made to the general grounds of the motion for new trial is the following: “We submit that a verdict for the plaintiffs was not authorized, and the general grounds of the motion for a new trial should be sustained and the verdict and judgment vacated and set aside.” We deem it sufficient to say that the verdict was authorized by the evidence.

The plaintiff in error contends that the general demurrer should have been sustained for the reason that the suit is one in ejectment for the recovery of land, and there is no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clarke Bros. v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Crew v. HutchesonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Hart v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Jones v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Hamil v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Payne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Wynn v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Crews v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Crews v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Griffin v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API