Legal Opinion

Abdulkadir v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 7, 2005No. S04G0747PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

Certiorari was granted to consider the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the proscriptions set forth in Georgia’s rape shield statute are applicable in prosecutions for child molestation. Because the language of the rape shield statute limits its application to prosecutions for rape, we conclude the Court of Appeals erred in its determination. In this particular case, however, the trial court properly applied the rape shield statute because, in addition to being prosecuted for child molestation, appellant was being prosecuted for rape. Therefore, while we disapprove of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. City of Gainesville v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Hollowell v. JoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P. v. KullSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. Hough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API