Legal Opinion
Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P. v. Kull
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 10, 2003No. S02G1262PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Kull v. Six Flags Over Ga., 254 Ga. App. 897 (564 SE2d 747) (2002), to determine whether OCGA § 9-11-43 (c) requires written notice of intent to rely on federal OSHA 1 law. We answer in the negative and reverse a contrary ruling in Kull, supra at (3).
Hull’s employer, Mahalo Advertising, was under contract to repair and maintain an electrical scoreboard located on a softball field on property owned by Six Flags. 2 Kull, who was a technician for Mahalo, was injured while changing a lightbulb in the Six Flags scoreboard. Kull…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Jesup v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- City of Roswell v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Risser v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Sims v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Samay v. SomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Innovative Clinical & Consulting Services, LLC v. First National Bank of AmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Abdulkadir v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Arby's Restaurant Group, Inc. v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.