Legal Opinion

Huston v. Fisk

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Lea, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSpofford, J.

The plaintiffs and defendants, proprietors of the property known as Banks’ Arcade, under a purchase at the bankrupt sale of Thomas Banks, were threatened with eviction by a judgment of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, at the suit of the City Bank against them. See 2 An., 114.

These proprietors thereupon held meetings, and resolved to contribute in proportion to their respective interests in the property, for the purpose of employ*770ing eminent counsel and prosecuting a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States.

The defendants participated in those meetings, and were parties to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weinberg Co. v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Union Iron & Foundry Co. v. SonnefieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Lomax v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API