Union Iron & Foundry Co. v. Sonnefield
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; Alfred Dillingham Land, Judge. Action by the Union Iron & Foundry Company against Sonnefield & Emmins and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
The plaintiff represents itself to be a corporation organized under the laws of Missouri, with its domicile in the city of St. Louis. The defendants are Sonnefield & Emmins (alleged to be building contractors, residents of Texas), the First National Bank Building Company (alleged to be a Louisiana corporation having its domicile in Shreveport), and the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (alleged to be a corporation doing a guaranty business in Louisiana through a duly appointed agent authorized to accept service of process).
Plaintiff avers that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chappell v. WaterworthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1889
- Huston v. FiskSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
- Late v. ArmorerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Mayo v. SavorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prater v. CraigheadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Soule v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Buckley v. S. Abraham Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Krotz v. Louisiana Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907