Legal Opinion

Pigage v. Chism

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 30, 1964No. 5-3195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The only appellant, E. J. Pigage Jr., is an 11-year-old boy and is called “Tad.” One afternoon in January 1962, while playing with a companion, Tad ran across the road in front of a car being driven by the appellee, Mrs. Chism, and Tad was struck and seriously and painfully injured. By his father, as next friend, Tad sued Mrs. Chism for damages; and Tad’s parents each also sought damages because of the injury to the minor and expenses incurred therefrom. The case was tried to a jury; and, among other instructions, the Court, without objection, told the jury:

“…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Shiels v. AudetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Tidd v. . SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Winner v. Oakland TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Welter v. CurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Ennis v. BrainerdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Baldridge v. Barcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Baldridge v. Barcon, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API