Legal Opinion

Trammell v. Rosen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On October 31, 1910, Sam Rosen instituted this suit against W. M, Trammell to recover upon 64 of a series of 98 notes executed by W. M. Trammell, and to foreclose the vendor's lien securing the same upon numerous lots in the Rosen Heights addition to North Ft.Worth. W. M. Trammell, joined by his wife, answered that lot 7, block 56, of the lots sought to be charged by the plaintiff constituted their homestead at and prior to the execution of the notes sued upon and they prayed that it be discharged from the asserted lien. It was also alleged that the plaintiff had wrongfully sequestered and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kalteyer v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Paschall v. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Wells v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Seay v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Jones v. MaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Bank v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Becker v. MaillotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Wroten v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Howell v. DuncansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API