Legal Opinion
Jolly v. Shapiro
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 6, 2002No. 02 C 1828PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, as well as Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). For the following the reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted and Plaintiffs’ cross-motion is denied.
I.BACKGROUND 1
This action arises from claimed violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. Plaintiffs, John and Patricia Jolly (“The Jollys”), own a home located at 11235 South Sangamon, in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. GC Servs. Ltd. P'shipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Rosado v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
- Campbell v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Dragon v. I.C. System, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Gesten v. Phelan Hallinan, PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.