Legal Opinion

Grace v. Henry Disston & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1952No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

Plaintiff, Michael Grace, sued defendant, Henry Disston & Sons, Inc., in trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of an accident which occurred on December 1, 1917 at defendant’s plant in Philadelphia. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. This appeal is from judgment non obstante veredicto entered on motion of the defendant.

In the early part of November in 1917 the defend* ant entered into a contract with the Bolger-Parker Company, a concern doing rigging work, to move from one location to another in a large building on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Engle v. ReiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Newingham v. J. C. Blair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Edmundson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Colloi v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. CarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Crawford Johnson & Co. v. DuffnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Brletich v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API