Legal Opinion
Matter of Pianowski
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 25, 1988No. 19-05278PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION RESPECTING CONFIRMATION OF SECOND AMENDED CHAPTER 12 PLAN
JAMES D. GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.
ISSUE
The principal issue before the court is whether the Debtors are legally permitted to make direct payments to certain creditors who hold allowed secured claims pursuant to the Debtors’ proposed Second Amended Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 As a corollary, the issue also encompasses whether the Debtors must pay the applicable commission and expense percentage fee to the Chapter 12 Trustee, if direct payments are authorized to be made.
BACKGROUND AND…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re CitrowskeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Greseth v. Federal Land Bank (In Re Greseth)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- Yarnall v. Erickson Partnership (In Re Erickson Partnership)District Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
- In Re Erickson PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1987
- In Re HagensickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Overholt v. Farm Credit Services (In Re Overholt)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- In Re Bdt Farms, Inc., Debtor, John E. Foulston, United States Trustee, Region 20 v. Bdt Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Matter of HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
- In Re HowardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.