Legal Opinion

In Re Erickson Partnership

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota

Decided August 27, 1987No. 15-40405PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PEDER K. ECKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on an objection to confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 12 plan of reorganization on the ground that it does not provide for payment of the Chapter 12 Trustee’s ten percent (10%) fee on all payments in the plan, filed by Attorney Andrew J. Schmid on behalf of the United States Trustee (“Trustee”) on April 9, 1987. Specifically, the Trustee insists that the “Plan must provide payment of the trustee’s fee on all claims modified by this reorganization and/or on all payments under this Plan.” 1…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In the Matter of John W. Foster, Jr. And Myrtha D. Foster, Debtors. John W. Foster, Jr., and Myrtha D. Foster v. William Heitkamp, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re RottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1987
  3. In Re CitrowskeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. In Re DziedzicUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Matter of PianowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  2. Overholt v. Farm Credit Services (In Re Overholt)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  3. Yarnall v. Erickson Partnership (In Re Erickson Partnership)District Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  4. In Re LandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
  5. In Re BurkhartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API