Legal Opinion

United States v. Huete-Sandoval

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 29, 2011No. 10-1413PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

On September 22, 2009, a jury convicted defendant-appellant Juan Huete-Sandoval (“Huete”) of various crimes related to his alleged fraudulent acquisition and use of a United States passport. On appeal, Huete argues, inter alia, that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for an alleged violation of the Speedy Trial Act (“STA”). We agree with his position. For the reasons elucidated below, we reverse the district court’s order and remand with instructions to determine whether the indictment should be dismissed with or without prejudice. 1

I. Background

On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. William MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Santiago-BecerrilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. United States v. Irizarry-ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Agosto-VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. (PC) Glass v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PC) Larry Joseph Thomas v. ValenciaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
  5. (PC) Moore v. EspinozaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API