Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Ashland Oil, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1984No. 1-983A309PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The Kirbys and Gryders appeal from a Pike Circuit Court's granting of summary judgment in favor of certain owners of mineral interests thereby quieting title to the interests in those owners.

We reverse.

FACTS

(On November 15, 1982, Ashland Oil, Inc., pursuant to Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 22, filed its complaint in inter-pleader naming as defendants the Kirbys and several other individuals owning mineral interests in the Kirbys' land. 1 In its complaint, Ashland alleged it had purchased crude oil produced from a 38 acre tract located in Pike…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Short v. Texaco, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Geller v. Merit Systems Protection BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vivian C. McCoy v. Harry E. Richards, Florence A. Richards, and Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Plymouth Fertilizer Co., Inc. v. BalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Billy L. Musgrave, Jr. and Kim A. Musgrave v. The Aluminum Company of America, Inc., and Alcoa Fuels, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Begley v. Peabody Coal Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. McCoy v. RichardsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API