Legal Opinion

Vivian C. McCoy v. Harry E. Richards, Florence A. Richards, and Ashland Oil, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 30, 1985No. 84-2940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to interpret the Indiana Dormant Mineral Interests Act, commonly known as the Mineral Lapse Act. Ind.Code §§ 32-5-11-1 through 32-5-11-8 (1976). Specifically, we must resolve whether a lease of a mineral interest qualifies as a “use” of that interest under the Act and whether the Act should apply to appellants. The district court resolved both questions in the negative and held that appellants’ interest had lapsed, thereby reverting to appellee.

I. The Facts

On August 14, 1942, appellants, Harry and Florence Richards, deeded to appellee and her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Short v. Texaco, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Indianapolis Airport Authority v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Kirby v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. McCoy v. RichardsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heil Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. MutchmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Stephan v. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Bageanis v. Am. Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Herriott v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API