Legal Opinion

Begley v. Peabody Coal Co.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 9, 1997No. EV 92-0105-C H/HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are the lessors under a coal mining lease executed in 1967. In Count II of their third amended complaint, plaintiffs seek a declaration that the lease has terminated because the lessee, defendant Peabody Coal Company, did not actively mine the leased property for ten years between 1986 and 1996. On July 1, 1997, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the claim, explained why it believed defendant Peabody was probably entitled to summary judgment on the claim, and allowed the parties an opportunity to respond.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. John T. Russell v. Acme-Evans Company, Adm Milling Company, and Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Tittle v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tennessee Valley Kaolin Corp. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. WeberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Mike Ross, Inc. v. Dante Coal Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API