Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dias

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 13, 1989PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The defendants, John A. Dias (John) and Edward J. Dias (Edward), appeal from their convictions, after a joint jury trial, of the murder in the first degree of Frank Rose (by reason of premeditation, extreme atrocity or cruelty, and felony murder), and burglary and armed assault. John also was convicted of larceny of a motor vehicle; that indictment was filed with John’s consent. John claims that the trial judge erred in denying a motion to sever the trials; in denying a motion to dismiss due to the Commonwealth’s delay in coming to trial; and in the instructions to the jury. He also contends…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Cruz v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ViriyahiranpaiboonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. LydonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. MacKenzieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. LauriaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API