Legal Opinion

Vucak v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 2004No. 0207-06650; A121595PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the City of Portland, alleging that a city employee’s negligence caused her personal injury. The outcome of the case depends ultimately on whether plaintiff adequately disclosed her claim against the city when she filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Concluding that she did not, the trial court granted the city’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals and we affirm.

To understand this case, one must first understand the somewhat attenuated connection between plaintiffs claim and the bankruptcy code — a connection the existence and mechanics of which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. DesmondCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. In Re MohringUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glover v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Concienne v. AsanteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Ricketts v. StrangeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  4. Headrick v. Bradley County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Jones v. RandleMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API