Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Clinchfield R.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1927No. 4680PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff in error filed suit in the District Court against the Clinehfield Railroad Company, as “the corporate successor of Carolina, Clinehfield & Ohio Railway Company,” to recover damages for the death of her intestate, who was killed March 8, 1923. Later she obtained leave to amend the declaration and made the Carolina, Clinehfield & Ohio Railway Company, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, and Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company parties defendant, alleging that the Carolina Company, on October 16, 1924, leased its line of railroad to the two last-mentioned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Arnold v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Luedecke v. Des Moines Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Bay v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sans Souci v. DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Clinchfield R. Co. v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- In re PfaeffleDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1933