Legal Opinion

Clinchfield R. Co. v. Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1930No. 5410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

Having instituted her action against the “Clinebfield Railroad Company, a corporate successor of tbe Carolina, Clinebfield & Ohio Railway Company,” plaintiff subsequently filed án amended or substituted declaration agáinst tbe same defendant, under the same name, but designating it as “lessee of 'the Carolina, Clinebfield & Ohio Railway Company,” and claiming tbe right to bold such lessee by virtue of said lease and tbe statutes of Tennessee (unmentioned in the first declaration), for a liability incurred by tbe Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway Company under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KoenneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lomax Ex Rel. Lomax v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Manhattan Oil Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. FL Mendez & Co. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  4. White v. Holland Furnace Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1939
  5. Blair v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API