Legal Opinion

Van Voorhis v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 19, 1965No. Civ. A. 2973-61PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

The defendant District of Columbia has moved this Court for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the fact that the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Among the grounds for this motion, the District asserts that:

“The D. C. Employee Non-Liability Act, Section 1-921, et seq., D.C.Code, 1961 Edition, may not be retroactively applied to the facts in this case and, therefore, the action against the District of Columbia is barred for the reason that the operation of the District of Columbia Fire Department is a governmental function.”

The facts giving rise to this case, as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael PinelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Dictograph Products Co. v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  2. De Letelier v. Republic of ChileDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  3. United States v. FullerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  4. Codest Engineering v. Hyatt International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. District of Columbia v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API