Legal Opinion

Bates v. City of Columbia

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 1990No. 1484PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Patrick Bates appeals from an order granting the City of Columbia summary judgment in an action brought by Bates pursuant to the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, S.C. CODE ANN. § 15-78-10, et seq. (Supp. 1989). Bates’ complaint alleges two Columbia police officers unlawfully searched his bicycle and unlawfully arrested and imprisoned him. The trial court found the officers conducted no search of Bates’ bicycle and had probable cause for arresting Bates. We reverse and remand.

Summary judgment should be granted only where it is perfectly clear that no genuine issue of material…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Jones v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Ford v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Lattie v. SHS Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ardis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. McNair v. RainsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Wortman v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Woods v. State Ex Rel. S.C. Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API