Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Blake

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 9, 1993No. 1920817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This petition for a writ of mandamus raises two issues: (1) Whether cases originally assigned to the equity division of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, based on their content, are due to be reassigned, given this Court’s recent holding in Ex parte Boykin, 611 So.2d 322 (Ala.1992); and (2) Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it entered “default” judgments against James D. Blake in two of his cases (CV-90-7671 and CV-91-0704) as a discovery sanction under Rule 37, Ala.R.Civ.P.

FACTS

This litigation relates to an ongoing dispute over control of a small, closely held…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte CokerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. American Family Care, Inc. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Ultracashmere House, Ltd. v. MeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coale v. Liberty National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ivey v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Ivy Fund Manager, LLC, d/b/a OC Ventures; Ivy Midtown GP, LLC; and NDG Student Living, LLC, d/b/a Varsity Campus v. CDH Real Estate Investment Management Company, Ltd.; Cook Summit Holding, LLC; and Cook Summit Investor, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026
  4. Mobile Investments, LLC, and The Broadway Group, LLC v. Corporate Pharmacy Services, Inc. (Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court: CV-20-900608).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API