Legal Opinion

Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 1989No. 88-474PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the trial court's dismissal for refusal to provide discovery, pursuant to Rule 37, A.R.Civ.P. We affirm.

Walter Iverson sued Xpert Tune, Inc. ("Xpert"), alleging breach of contract, fraud, and misrepresentation. The substance of these claims was that Xpert had diagnosed Iverson's automobile as having a defective fuel pump and had subsequently replaced the pump, when, in fact, he alleges, the fuel pump was "in good working order."

Xpert filed with the trial court, and served upon Iverson's counsel, a request for production and/or inspection of documents, specifically…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Clayton E. Durham v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Salter v. Alfa Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Synergy Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API