Ex Parte Boykin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
611 So.2d 322 (1992)
Ex parte Samuel M. BOYKIN, Jr., and Apon, Inc.
(Re Samuel M. BOYKIN, Jr., and Apon, Inc. v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN & COMPANY, et al.)
Ex parte BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, on behalf of itself and its members, et al.
(Re BIRMINGHAM EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, et al. v. BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.)
No. 1911630, 1911693.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
December 4, 1992.
Andrew P. Campbell, Eddie Leitman and Shawn Hill Crook of Leitman, Siegel, Payne & Campbell, P.C., Birmingham, for Samuel Boykin, Jr., Apon, Inc. and the plaintiff Class.
Joe R. Whatley,…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holsemback v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- United Supply Co. v. HINTON CONST. & DEV., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte K.L.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- DuBose v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- J. S. N. v. T. G. N.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Hughes v. BrantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Turenne v. TurenneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.