Crowell v. Sonoma County
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County. ' Plaintiff recovered judgment, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. ■ J. G. McCullough, Attorney-General, for Appellant, cited Sherbourne v. Yuba County, 21 Cal. 113, and Hoffman v. San Joaquin Co. 21 Cal. 426.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.
The complaint states that the plaintiff, before, and at the time of the grievances complained of, was lawfully possessed of certain lands in said county, describing them; that “ the defendant, contriving to injure the plaintiff on the 1st or October, 1859, at said county, built a bridge across the Santa Rosa Creek at the southern end of “C” street, in the Town or Santa Rosa, and in building said bridge, wrongfully and unlaw*315fully erected an abutment at the north end of said bridge, extending into the channel of said creek, and has kept and continued the abutment in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sherbourne v. Yuba Cty.California Supreme Court · 1862
- Huffman v. San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by16 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Stilling v. Town of ThorpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Nelson County v. LovingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- James v. Trustees of Wellston TownshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.