Legal Opinion

Douthat v. Bank of Quapaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 14492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN. J.

This action was brought by- the defendant in error, as plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, as defendant below, to recover on a promissory note. It is the contention of the plaintiff in error that the note was executed as an accommodation for the defendant in error and was, for that reason, without consideration, and also that the note was delivered upon the condition that th!e same should not Become a binding obligation until it was signed by other parties whose signatures were never procured. The note was executed in renewal of a pre-existing debt, and the defendant in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knapp v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Beam v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of HealdtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Smith v. Maud Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Boyd v. City State Bank, Wellington, TexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API