Legal Opinion

Smith v. Maud Oil & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13708PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was instituted in the district court of Pottawatomie county, Okla., on the 2nd day of March, 1921, by A. R. Morgan, plaintiff in the trial court, against the Maud Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, and Charles Sochor, Frank Miskovsky, and J. L. Straka, to recover the sum of $15,200, alleged to have been expended under a certain contract with the defendants for the drilling of a certain oil and gas well in Pottawatomie county, and for the foreclosure of a lien and damages. To which petition the defendants filed their answer and cross-petition; defendants admit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Page v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Lyon v. LyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Barnett v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. v. Pennok Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Troup v. HineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Northern Implement & Produce Co. v. Turner-Clinton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API