Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Trybom

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 24, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, S.

The decedent, an attorney, died on March 19, 1936, leaving a will which was admitted to probate on April 22, 1936. Thereafter a proceeding was brought to construe paragraph “second” of the will, which paragraph reads as follows: “I doj *485hereby give, devise and bequeath to my associate, Dorothy M. Hannigan, all of my office furniture, and all of my interest in the library at my office at #51 Chambers Street, New York City, that being a one-half interest, and a one-half interest in all of the pending legal matters, in consideration of the services to be rendered in the probate of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Spalding v. . RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Jerome Hafter v. Ruth Farkas and Jonathan FarkasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Condren v. GraceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Knapp v. McFarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. In Re Brown's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API