Legal Opinion
Knapp v. McFarland
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 1972No. 69 Civ. 2590PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LEVET, District Judge.
As indicated by the amended title above set forth, two actions are involved in this matter, to wit, (1) an action by Elizabeth K. Knapp, as assignee of Tanner and Friedman, for the collection of legal fees, as more particularly hereinafter set forth; (2) an action by Me Farland against Tanner and Friedman for repayment of monies heretofore paid on account of legal services upon the ground of certain alleged breaches of fiduciary obligations by said attorneys. Since this action contemplated the return of monies from Tanner…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Worden v. SearlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mills v. CooterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Canet v. Gooch Ware TravelsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Harden v. Warner Amex Cable Communications Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- O'Hearn v. Gormally (In re Gormally)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Guggenheimer v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.