Legal Opinion
Repstine v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1998No. 96-1387PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs and appellants Robert Repstine and BN General Committee of Adjustment (former C & S) GO-291 appeal the grant of summary judgment to defendant Burlington Northern, Inc. (“BN”) in this case involving the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. § 152. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Defendant United Transportation Union (“UTU”) is the certified collective bargaining representative for BN employees in the crafts or classes of trainmen, conductors, locomotive firemen, yardmen and yardmasters. 1 Plaintiff GO-291 is one of the committees comprising UTU, and plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robert Repstine v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998