Legal Opinion
People v. Perez
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joel L. Blumenfeld, J.
The defendant moves to suppress his statement made as a result of a Central Booking Queens (CBQ) interview.2 The issues faced by the court include:
*274(1) Whether the promises made in the prosecutor’s statement to the defendant prior to the issuance of the Miranda warnings (hereinafter referred to as the preamble) negated those warnings and rendered the defendant’s statement inadmissible as involuntarily made pursuant to CPL 60.45;(2) Whether the People’s failure to live up to the promises to investigate the defendant’s version of the facts as made in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Phillips v. Fashion Institute of TechnologyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024