Legal Opinion

Ball v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided February 6, 2013No. Docket Nos. 17593-11, 17594-11, 17595-11, 17596-11, 17597-11, 17598-11, 17599-11, 17600-11, 17601-11UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R BALL FOR R BALL III BY APPT, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Ball v. Comm'r

Docket Nos. 17593-11, 17594-11, 17595-11, 17596-11, 17597-11, 17598-11, 17599-11, 17600-11, 17601-11

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2013-39; 2013 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 39; 105 T.C.M. (CCH) 1257;

February 6, 2013, Filed

An appropriate decision will be entered.

Dennis Lawrence Stein, for petitioners.

Paul L. Darcy, for respondent.

KERRIGAN, Judge.

KERRIGAN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KERRIGAN, Judge: In these consolidated cases respondent determined the following deficiencies and revised deficiencies…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Edwards v. Cuba RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Gitlitz v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Commissioner v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powers v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  2. Alan J. & Susan E. Powers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  3. R Ball for R Ball III by Appt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. R Ball for R Ball III by Appt v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API