Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Beall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1897PublishedCited by 41 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The defendant in error was an employe of the plaintiffs in error, and while engaged in the performance of a duty to his employers was frightfully injured, by the fall of a freight and passenger elevator in the storehouse of plaintiffs in error. At the time of the accident, the defendant in error was on the elevator, and the fall was occasioned by the sudden breaking of the two wire cables by which it was suspended. To recover dam-' ages for the injury thus sustained, this action was brought.

In his declaration, the plaintiff alleged that the elevator was "so carelessly and negligently…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ruloff v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Cowley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Muldowney v. Ill. Cent. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  4. Mississippi Mills Co. v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Church v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Mauch v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. FollettTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Banks v. St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  5. State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API