State v. Cozart
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANICE M. HOLDER, J„
delivered the
opinion of the court,
in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, C.J., and FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined.
We granted review of this case to decide whether a trial court must instruct the jury based upon this Court’s holding in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1991). We hold that the trial court properly declined to instruct the jury that it should determine whether the confinement, movement, or detention inherent in the Mdnapping was essentially incidental to the accompanying robbery. Applying the principles first…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AnthonyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Chatwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Warren P. Berry. Appeal of Warren Berry. Appeal of Guillermo BrignoniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HansonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. Prince AdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.