Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marte v. Berkman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2010Published

1Concurrence

McGuire, J. (concurring).

I agree the petition should be dismissed because petitioners (the defendants in the underlying criminal prosecution) implicitly consented to the mistrial. Additional discussion of the relevant facts and legal principles, however, is warranted. I also agree, with Justice Berkman that “[t]he declaration of a mistrial was within the court’s discretion, and a retrial of the undecided count would not offend the double jeopardy rule.”

After an eight-day trial, the court submitted to the jury the three counts of robbery charged in the indictment (attempted first-degree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. SatloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. DekleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API