Legal Opinion
Brock v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 26, 1937No. 33718PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
This is an intervention wherein intervener claims an offset of its deposit against its note.
This case was submitted to the lower court on the following agreed statement of facts:
It is agreed that the Citizens Building & Loan Association borrowed $5,000 from1 the Citizens Bank & Trust Company on the 3d day of January, 1933, for which it executed its promissory pote payable to the order of the Citizens Bank & Trust Company at its banking house in the city of Baton-Rouge, La., on demand, and secured by the. collateral mentioned in the petition of intervener.
That said note was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- American Nat. Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rex Finance Company v. CaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. HollowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Bank of St. John v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938