Legal Opinion

Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Holloway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1938No. Nos. 34600, 34599, 34601PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

In each of the above cases, Reconstruction Finance Corporation alleges that it is the holder for value and before maturity of certain promissory notes made and executed by each of the three defendants, who pleaded the prescription of five years against plaintiff’s demand and the notes sued upon, besides setting up other defenses in the answer of each defendant.' The cases were consolidated in the lower court, but a separate judgment was rendered in each case, maintaining the plea of prescription, and a separate transcript of appeal has been filed by the defendant in each case.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boullt v. SarpySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  2. Conger v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. Latiolais v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. Wilson v. BannenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  5. Montgomery v. LevistonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ernest M. Loeb Co. v. Avoyelles Drainage Dist. No. 8District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1945
  2. Mrs. Sarah Jennings Carter v. United States of America Ex Rel. Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Schwegmann Bank & Trust Co. Of Jefferson v. Elva S. Falkenberg, Charles B. Caldwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. First National Bank of Shreveport v. QuerbesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Kaplan v. University Lake Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API