Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Thomson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
The record is made up of four suits which were consolidated for trial in the district court, a separate judgment being rendered in each suit.
The first three suits were foreclosures by executory process, with the Reconstruction Finance Corporation as the plaintiff and J. S. Thomson, Mark F. Thomson, and the Thomson Gin Company, Inc., as the respective defendants. The fourth and last suit was one by J. S. Thomson and Mark F. Thomson against the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. Alleging fraud and want of consideration, the defendant in each of the first three suits obtained an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zeigler v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Davis v. WelchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- R. M. Walmsley & Co. v. TheusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- W. W. Carre Co. v. E. J. Stewart & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Bank of Coushatta v. CoatsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Antoine v. Elder Realty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Rex Finance Company v. CaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. SabatierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Bank of St. John v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.