Legal Opinion
Fibernet Telecom Group, Inc. v. East Coast Optical Services
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Emily Jane Goodman, J.
Petitioner moves pursuant to Lien Law § 19 (6) for an order summarily discharging six notices of mechanic’s lien filed by *462respondent, for failure to comply with Lien Law § 9. Petitioner alleges that all six notices (a) fail to name the partners of the lienor, (b) fail to state the lienor’s business address, and (c) fail to state the lienor’s principal place of business. Petitioner additionally contends that one of the six notices was not filed timely pursuant to Lien Law § 10. Respondent opposes this motion, arguing that it has substantially complied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Teitler v. McDermott & McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Empire Pile Driving Corp. v. Hylan Sanitary Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Diamond Architecturals, Inc. v. EFCO Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Waters v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Corina Associates, Inc. v. McManus, Longe, Brockwehl, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.