Legal Opinion

Marriage of Stroh v. Stroh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 11, 1986No. CX-85-1353Published

1Opinion of the Court

383 N.W.2d 402 (1986)

In re the Marriage of Janie C. STROH, Petitioner, Respondent,

v.

Donald George STROH, Appellant.

No. CX-85-1353.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 11, 1986.

Charles D. Reite, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Allen H. Aaron, Minneapolis, for appellant; Charles Rubenstein, Minneapolis, of counsel.

Heard, considered and decided en banc by POPOVICH, C.J., and WOZNIAK, LANSING, HUSPENI, FORSBERG, NIERENGARTEN and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Donald George Stroh appeals from the division of property in a dissolution decree, contending that the trial court failed to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Brandenburg v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API