Legal Opinion

Gridley v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 10, 1972No. 55563PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued three doctors and a hospital for damages caused the wife by the failure of the defendants to make a pregnancy test before doing a dilatation and curettage (referred to by the doctors as a “D and C”) and a gall bladder operation on her, when, in fact, she was pregnant and delivered a child seven months later. The court dismissed the hospital before the trial, dismissed defendant Doane at the close of the evidence, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the other two doctors, Johnson and Botwin.

The plaintiffs appeal, 1 claiming various…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Abernathy v. Sisters of St. Mary'sSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hardy v. BrantleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Elam v. College Park HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Hurlock v. Park Lane Medical Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API