Legal Opinion
Garth Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Johnson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1908No. Docket No. 184PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Delta; Stone, J. Bill by tbe Gartb Lumber & Sbingle Company and others to restrain Ole Johnson and others from interfering with complainants’ sorting logs and other forest products in a navigable stream. From an order granting a temporary injunction, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Defendants appealed from an order granting an injunction. 150 Mich. 73. They were restrained—
“From in any manner interfering with or preventing the booming, sorting and removal of the logs, ties, poles, posts and other forest products belonging to the said com*206plainants, now lying at or near the mouth of White Fish river, in Delta county, Michigan, and from in any manner interfering with any booms temporarily attached to the shore of any of the parcels of land belonging to said defendants, and from interfering with the men in the employ of the said complainants, or any of them, in walking…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Perry v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Cohn v. Wausau Boom Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Mashburn v. St. Joe Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Public Service Co. v. McCloskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994