Legal Opinion

Aceco Valves, LLC v. Neal

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 2024No. 5:21-cv-00368Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ACECO VALVES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-21-368-D ) BRAD NEAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant O.W. Valve, LLC’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Third- Party Subpoena of David Hudgins [Doc. No. 132]. Plaintiff filed a response [Doc. No. 138], and O.W. Valve’s deadline to file a reply has expired. The matter is, therefore, fully briefed and at issue. BACKGROUND A brief factual background giving rise to this case is set forth in the Court’s recent order granting Plaintiff’s Motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings In Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Transcor, Inc. v. Furney Charters, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Rice v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API